Annotated Citation #2

"Replacing Animals in Medical Education." Good Medicine Magazine Vol. XVII, No. 2, pp.6-9 Spring 2008. SIRS Researcher. SIRS Knowledge Source. Edina High School. 7 Dec 2008 http://sks.sirs.com/cgi-bin/hst-article-display?id=SMN0307H-0-126&artno=0000277759&type=ART&shfilter=U&key=&title=Replacing%20Animals%20in%20Medical%20Education&res=Y&ren=Y&gov=Y&Ink=Y&ic=Y

This article differs from that of James Randerson in that this article talks about Jennifer Dankle and others and about their personal experiences with animal experimentation in schools to fuel medical education. This article shows strictly the negative sides of animal experimentation but in that of James Randerson talks mostly of the positive side. The article talks of how Jennifer and others were presented with the task of dissecting live dogs for medical school. They say that the event changed their lives and they became emotionally scarred. A good outcome is that more than 90% of all medical schools have stopped using animal experimentation for medical education. The PCRM and other animal rights groups have been very involved in petitioning against the schools. There has also been  a lot of propaganda such as ads, banners, billboards, and protests against the schools which have proven to be influential.